Jurassic World Movie Film News

Jurassic World Hits Theaters In:

Directed by Colin Trevorrow and starring Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Ty Simpkins and Nick Robinson, Jurassic World will hit theaters June 12th, 2015.

New Dinosaurs for JP4?

From: Jurassic World Movie Replies: 18

TheGreenRaptor

I personally think that JP4 should stick with the dinos from Jurassic Park 1 and The Lost World: Jurassic Park. If we include new dinos, how will they be incorporated into the story (we don't even have a back story to the spino). Colin should avoid adding new dinos and stick with the regulars. What do you guys think?

PS: NO FEATHERS!!!! (If you would like explanation please request here thanks ;))


18 Replies

Makaveli7

The Spino does have a backstory. It was thought to be a Baryonyx because it didn't have a sail as a juvenile. I think JP4 should have Carnotaurus as a secondary villain, much like the Velociraptors. Others could make cameos.

Future Team Raptor member

Rex Fan 684

I think new dinosaurs can be dangerous, no pun intended. It has not gone over well before. Not to mention the fact that, some people might start to think, "Holy cow, where do they keep all these dinosaurs?" There is only so much room on those islands. A few new ones for a cameo and maybe one or two could have a somewhat major role as a side antagonist or something.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
http://www.everythingdinosaurs.weebly.com

Mr.Happy9097

With the return to Nublar, I can only see adding Metriacanthosaurus. Did anyone else notice when Nedry was stealing the embryos, the sticker that said Metriacanthosaurus? That is why I think Metri would be the best chance for a new dinosaur.

They should all be destroyed.

Robert Muldoon

Rex Fan 684

I saw that. A minor antagonist perhaps. I'm sure you see what I mean when I say that they can only have so many dinosaurs and if they keep adding and adding, it's just gonna get to be too much.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
http://www.everythingdinosaurs.weebly.com

Mr.Happy9097

I didn't actually see your post until just now because I started before you posted. I agree that there can only be so many dinosaurs on the islands (time for two more!). I could see Metri being second or third just because the Raptors are every bit as important as T-Rex (more if you ask Jack Horner).

They should all be destroyed.

Robert Muldoon

Rex Fan 684

No disrespect to Jack Horner, but I strongly disagree with just about every theory he has. Just sayin.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
http://www.everythingdinosaurs.weebly.com

Mr.Happy9097

Looking for dinosaur expert for series.

Now state one of your beliefs.
T-Rex is strictly a scavenger.
Why are there healed bite marks on Triceratops fossils from Rex?
Rex thought it was asleep, bit, Trike woke up and scared Rex
away.
Ok, NEXT!!!!!

They should all be destroyed.

Robert Muldoon

Mr.Happy9097

I meant dead, sorry about that.

They should all be destroyed.

Robert Muldoon

Rex Fan 684

I'm sure that Tyrannosaurus scavenged from time to time, but then again, what predator would not do that? It's really just common sense. I tend to agree with Philip Currie, Peter Larson, Robert Bakker, and a few other scientists out there.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
http://www.everythingdinosaurs.weebly.com

Mr.Happy9097

I know, I mean, what scavenger needs a 9 ton bite force? I am pretty sure that every carnivore in the history of forever would scavenge.

They should all be destroyed.

Robert Muldoon

Rex Fan 684

Exactly! Or binocular vision for that matter. A strong sense of smell and small arms does not mean the animal is a scavenger. The sense of smell can be used to track prey when it's out of earshot or out of sight. As far as the arms, they could be used as meat hooks or something. Besides, wolves, hyenas, eagles, crocs, sharks, and many other modern day carnivores are successful hunters and they don't use their front feet. Heck, the abelisaurs had smaller arms than T-rex, and no one ever thought they were pure scavengers.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
http://www.everythingdinosaurs.weebly.com

Mr.Happy9097

Rex's arms could hold up to something like 500 pounds each, so they could be used to hold something in place, or during mating, but not much.

They should all be destroyed.

Robert Muldoon

Rex Fan 684

No, probably not, but like I said, why does a carnivore need long arms to be a predator? It's simple, it does not. That's a fact, we see that in modern animals and they are all we have when it comes to seeing how dinosaurs behaved. Behavior does not change. Every living thing has the same basic behavior in the end.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
http://www.everythingdinosaurs.weebly.com

Mr.Happy9097

Something with a 9 ton bite force does not need strong arms. It's arms should be strong enough to help it get up, and that is it.

They should all be destroyed.

Robert Muldoon

TheGreenRaptor

Where does it say that Spino was thought to be Baryonyx? Where was this confirmed?

Username

Password

or Register an Account
Follow News on Jurassic World
Latest JP Fan Discussions
5 replies
Chapter 10

Apr-23-2014 1:23 PM

2 replies
Frank Marshall's "Big News" Announced

Apr-23-2014 11:21 AM

Latest Jurassic World Images
Jurassic Park Fan Ratio
Recent Status Updates
Raptor-401 It's okay. Gonna post the final chapter soon, FYI.
Mr.Happy9097 Oh well, I'm sure that'll be fixed soon. I GTG now, sorry I couldn't talk longer.
Raptor-401 NO, I have noticed that too! It annoyes me too!
Mr.Happy9097 Am I the only one who's bugged by the green bar that says online when the person hasn't been active in two hours?
Raptor-401 Good day Scified.
Demplex The Godzilla Snickers commercial just popped up on Godzilla-Movies.com O.o
oduodu Nikola tesla also
Part of the SciFied Fan Site Network
© 2012 - 2013 SciFied.com
Legal | Terms of Use